課程標(biāo)題：威海環(huán)翠區(qū)英語(yǔ)口語(yǔ)培訓(xùn)在哪里

威海環(huán)翠區(qū)英語(yǔ)口語(yǔ)是威海環(huán)翠區(qū)英語(yǔ)口語(yǔ)培訓(xùn)學(xué)校的重點(diǎn)專業(yè)，威海市知名的英語(yǔ)口語(yǔ)培訓(xùn)機(jī)構(gòu)，教育培訓(xùn)知名品牌，威海環(huán)翠區(qū)英語(yǔ)口語(yǔ)培訓(xùn)學(xué)校師資力量雄厚，全國(guó)各大城市均設(shè)有分校，學(xué)校歡迎你的加入。

威海環(huán)翠區(qū)英語(yǔ)口語(yǔ)培訓(xùn)學(xué)校分布威海市環(huán)翠區(qū),文登市,榮成市,乳山市等地,是威海市極具影響力的英語(yǔ)口語(yǔ)培訓(xùn)機(jī)構(gòu)。

would rather do A than do B

對(duì)于我們的國(guó)家來(lái)說(shuō)，這是一個(gè)充滿希望和自豪的時(shí)刻。

【點(diǎn)評(píng)】

除了這個(gè)運(yùn)動(dòng)，同時(shí)代的還有年輕人的反越戰(zhàn)運(yùn)動(dòng)，大學(xué)生的要求自治運(yùn)動(dòng)，婦女的要求平等運(yùn)動(dòng)等等……在這些運(yùn)動(dòng)的影響下，當(dāng)時(shí)的美國(guó)社會(huì)呈現(xiàn)出完全不同的風(fēng)貌。因此，我們要了解美國(guó)，就不能不了解這段美國(guó)年輕人以天下為己任、參與締造歷史的特殊時(shí)期。

【作者觀點(diǎn)分析】

6. Before being widely collected for its artistic drawings and interesting stories, comic books were purchased cheaply by little boys across America.

我們?cè)谇懊娣治鲞^(guò)如何變化用詞，變化用句；盡管都是“變化”，但用詞變化需要努力擴(kuò)大詞匯量，只要留意，就可以達(dá)到“四兩撥千斤”的效果。

第二段，講政客的時(shí)候，以美國(guó)前總統(tǒng)小布什在伊拉克戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)問(wèn)題上的出爾反爾為例。（For example, George. W. Bush have been saying he will end the war in the Middle East since 2003. Now, in 2008, the war is continuing raging fervently.

你也可以這么開(kāi)始這篇文章，比如成功的人受到公眾的羨慕，有鮮花掌聲，金錢地位，但失敗的人受到公眾的唾棄，甚至是親人的蔑視等等。

B雖然做到了用兩個(gè)名詞結(jié)構(gòu)，但存在三個(gè)問(wèn)題。因?yàn)閜eople是復(fù)數(shù)，所以has應(yīng)為have；即使改為have, people who have not intelligence的表達(dá)也很奇怪，應(yīng)該說(shuō)people who don't have intelligence或people who have no intelligence；另外，和low motivation平行的結(jié)構(gòu)也應(yīng)該是個(gè)形容詞＋名詞的形式，但B采用的是一個(gè)介詞短語(yǔ)來(lái)修飾其前面的名詞結(jié)構(gòu)。同時(shí)，B的表達(dá)非常唆，不符合SAT的簡(jiǎn)潔性原則。

收集在本章的10篇優(yōu)秀范文，都是SAT滿分作文的典范之作，其中第9和第10篇系筆者的學(xué)生最近參加SAT考試的滿分作品，筆者一字未改，只是為了讓同學(xué)們一窺SAT滿分作文的真實(shí)面貌。

(A)the city's local customs baffled the Greg

好萊塢巨片泰坦尼克號(hào)，讓多少觀眾淚水漣漣。

沒(méi)有足夠的語(yǔ)言能力，很難寫(xiě)到一定的篇幅，這樣文章的說(shuō)服性就不夠。

I wish you\'d stop trying to butter me up.

（我希望你不要再恭維我了。）

●The sum of the digits is 11.

開(kāi)始段落的基本套路是講些堂而皇之的話，但是這些話必須要圍繞著一些關(guān)鍵詞展開(kāi)。

In the literary world, success is measured by the number of books sold. Authors who sell millions of books are valued morethan those who sell hundreds of books, so it appears that worth, in this case, is best judged by a writer's productivity. This scenario, however, is misleading, since one writer may produce a single work that becomes a best-seller in comparison to another writer who produces dozens of works each of which sell a limited number. Which writer truly has more worth? A specific example o illustrate this scenario is Bill Clinton compared to Judy Blume. Clinton recently published his memories, which will likely be very successful and become a best-seller. Blume, the author of many books for teenagers, probably hasn't and won't ever appear on the best-seller list. Is Clinton worth more because his name and political career make his book successful? Or is Blume worth more because her portrayals of teen life affect many meaningful criteria of judging worth.

　　You ought to have been here yesterday.

　　你昨天就應(yīng)該來(lái)。

　　ought not to have done 句型。表示一件不該做的事情卻做了。

威海環(huán)翠區(qū)英語(yǔ)口語(yǔ)培訓(xùn)學(xué)校成就你的夢(mèng)想之旅。學(xué)英語(yǔ)口語(yǔ)就來(lái)威海環(huán)翠區(qū)英語(yǔ)口語(yǔ)培訓(xùn)學(xué)校